Shrader v. Biddinger et al
Filing
152
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave of Court 147 is denied as moot. The plaintiff shall forthwith stop mailing to the court motions that he has already filed by facsimile, otherwise sanctions may very well be imposed for failing to comply with the courts orders. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/10/2011.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01881-REB-MJW
GREG SHRADER,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. ALAN BIDDINGER,
EARIK BEANN,
WAVE 59 TECHNOLOGIES INT’L INC.,
WILLIAM BRADSTREET STEWART,
INSTITUTE OF COSMOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,
SACRED SCIENCE INSTITUTE, and
WAVE 59 TECHNOLOGIES INT’L INC. OWNER’S [sic] AND OFFICERS,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave of Court (Docket No.
147) is denied as moot. This motion is the same motion that plaintiff filed by facsimile
on May 4, 2011 (Docket No. 138), which was granted by this court by Minute Order filed
on May 5, 2011 (Docket No. 141). By mailing to the court the same motion already filed
by facsimile, plaintiff has failed to comply with the directives contained in a Minute Order
entered on April 15, 2011 (Docket No. 124), which ordered “that when filing papers by
facsimile, plaintiff shall comply with the directives contained in D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1. In
particular, plaintiff shall maintain the original paper that was sent by facsimile rather
than sending it to the court by mail. Mailing a document after it has been filed by
facsimile when not ordered to do so by the court results in duplicative filings and a
waste of judicial and clerk’s office resources.” It is thus further
ORDERED that the plaintiff shall forthwith stop mailing to the court motions that
he has already filed by facsimile, otherwise sanctions may very well be imposed for
failing to comply with the court’s orders.
Date:
May 10, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?