North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. Kinard et al
Filing
90
ORDER. Docket Nos. 9 , 11 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 49 , 58 , and 64 shall be sealed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/12/11. (mnf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01960-PAB-KMT
LU CELIA KINARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CYNTHIA ROTHROCK KINARD, individually and
as Administratrix of the Estate of Walter A. Kinard,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ certificates of compliance [Docket
Nos. 82, 88] with the Court’s July 7, 2011 Order [Docket No. 76]. On July 7, 2011, the
Court ordered that Docket Nos. 35, 41, 44, 68, 72, and 75 be sealed because they
violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a). The Court further ordered the parties to
review all of their filings and certify that no other information subject to Rule 5.2(a)
appears in any of their public filings. If any such confidential information was identified,
the parties were required to file motions to seal the relevant documents and to re-file
the documents in compliance with Rule 5.2(a). Both parties have identified additional
filings that violated Rule 5.2(a), but have failed to file motions to seal. The Court
nevertheless will consider the requests to seal included in the parties’ certificates of
compliance. See Docket No. 82 at 2, ¶ 5; Docket No. 88 at 2, ¶ 2. Pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), it is
ORDERED that Docket Nos. 9, 11, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 49, 58, and 64
shall be sealed.
DATED July 12, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?