North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. Kinard et al

Filing 90

ORDER. Docket Nos. 9 , 11 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 49 , 58 , and 64 shall be sealed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/12/11. (mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 10-cv-01960-PAB-KMT LU CELIA KINARD, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA ROTHROCK KINARD, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Walter A. Kinard, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the parties’ certificates of compliance [Docket Nos. 82, 88] with the Court’s July 7, 2011 Order [Docket No. 76]. On July 7, 2011, the Court ordered that Docket Nos. 35, 41, 44, 68, 72, and 75 be sealed because they violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a). The Court further ordered the parties to review all of their filings and certify that no other information subject to Rule 5.2(a) appears in any of their public filings. If any such confidential information was identified, the parties were required to file motions to seal the relevant documents and to re-file the documents in compliance with Rule 5.2(a). Both parties have identified additional filings that violated Rule 5.2(a), but have failed to file motions to seal. The Court nevertheless will consider the requests to seal included in the parties’ certificates of compliance. See Docket No. 82 at 2, ¶ 5; Docket No. 88 at 2, ¶ 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), it is ORDERED that Docket Nos. 9, 11, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 49, 58, and 64 shall be sealed. DATED July 12, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?