Ramos v. Milyard et al

Filing 44

ORDER. The Recommendation is accepted. motion for temporary restraining order 31 is DENIED. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/23/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Zita Leeson Weinshienk Civil Action No. 10-cv-01970-ZLW-BNB CHARLES RAMOS, JUNIOR, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN KEVIN MILYARD, CDOC, CO NAIL, CDOC, CO HARDY, CDOC, CO HIGGINS, CDOC, LIEUTENANT ZWORN, CDOC, and DENNY OWENS, Hearings Officer, CDOC, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ The matter before the Court is a motion for temporary restraining order filed by Plaintiff (Doc. No. 31). The motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland for recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1C. On February 16, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued his Recommendation that the motion for temporary restraining order be denied.1 No party filed objections to the Recommendation. 1 Doc. No. 34. Having reviewed the record and the Recommendation, the Court is satisfied "that there is no clear error on the face of the record."2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 31; Jan. 25, 2011) is denied. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 23rd day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: ___________________________________ ZITA LEESON WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note; Summer v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). 2 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?