Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 107

Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 5/31/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Court directs that Linda Lenox be deposed as a 30(b)(6) witness. Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Overrule Objections 102 , is resolved as instructed on record. Defendants' Motion to Quash Depositions and for Protection 103 , is granted in part and denied in part as stated on record.(FTR: J. Hawkins) (rpmcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
May 31, 2012
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Jennifer Hawkins
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02139-RPM
LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.

G. Stephen Long
Nicole A. Westbrook
Cash K. Parker
Michelle L. Gomez

MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation;
Steven M. Zager
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INCORPORATED,
Michael Simons
an Indiana corporation;
MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a
MEDTRONIC NEUROLOGIC TECHNOLOGIES, a California corporation; and
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD., a Japanese corporation,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Pending Motions
1:54 p.m.

Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks.
Counsel state they have the discovery materials (documents and transcripts) produced from the arbitration
proceeding.
Court states its understanding of the case facts.
Mr. Long answers questions asked by the Court (Bruxx report / market share - Shawn McQuinn / 2010
spine report, arbitration proceeding).
Argument by Mr. Long.
Court directs that Linda Lenox be deposed as a 30(b)(6) witness.
Argument by Mr. Zager.
Argument by Mr. Simons.
ORDERED:

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Overrule Objections [102],
is resolved as instructed on record.

May 31, 2012
10-cv-02139-RPM
Continued argument by Mr. Zager.
Argument by Mr. Long.
Rebuttal argument by Mr. Zager.
Further argument by Mr. Long.
ORDERED:

Defendants’ Motion to Quash Depositions and for Protection [103], is granted in
part and denied in part as stated on record.

3:10 p.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 1 hr. 16 min.

2