Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 201

ORDER Granting 199 Motion to Restrict Access and File Under Seal 200 Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/29/2013.(rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02139-RPM- BNB LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL CORPORATION, a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation; MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation; MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a MEDTRONIC NEUROLOGIC TECHNOLOGIES, a California corporation; and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD., a Japanese corporation, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RESTRICT ACCESS AND FILE UNDER SEAL DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD. AND MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________________ On this date, this Court considered Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Medtronic PS Medical, Incorporated, d/b/a Medtronic Neurologic Technologies, and Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Restrict Access and File Under Seal Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion to Restrict Access”). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment shall be restricted as Level 1 access and sealed. SIGNED this 29th day of March, 2013. BY THE COURT s/Richard P. Matsch ____________________________________________ RICHARD P. MATSCH, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?