Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 204

Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 5/29/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Taking under advisement 177 Motion for Summary Judgment. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: May 29, 2013 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 10-cv-02139-RPM LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL CORPORATION, G. Stephen Long Nicole A. Westbrook Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation; MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation; MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Medtronic Neurologic Technologies, a California corporation; and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD., a Japanese corporation, Steven M. Zager Michael Simons Catherine F. Spillman Conor F. Farley Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment 10:30 a.m. Court in session. Court’s preliminary remarks. Mr. Long answers questions asked by the Court regarding definition of the products /product market at issue and duration of claim. 10:38 a.m. 10:53 a.m. 11:11 a.m. Argument by Mr. Zager. Argument by Mr. Long. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Zager. Statements by Mr. Simons. 11:19 a.m. Further argument by Mr. Long. ORDERED: Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co., Ltd. and Medtronic PS Medical, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [168] /[177], is taken under advisement. 11:25 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 55 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?