Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Filing
204
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 5/29/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Taking under advisement 177 Motion for Summary Judgment. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
May 29, 2013
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02139-RPM
LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL CORPORATION,
G. Stephen Long
Nicole A. Westbrook
Plaintiff,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation;
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INCORPORATED,
an Indiana corporation;
MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a
Medtronic Neurologic Technologies, a California corporation; and
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD., a Japanese corporation,
Steven M. Zager
Michael Simons
Catherine F. Spillman
Conor F. Farley
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment
10:30 a.m.
Court in session.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
Mr. Long answers questions asked by the Court regarding definition of the products /product market at
issue and duration of claim.
10:38 a.m.
10:53 a.m.
11:11 a.m.
Argument by Mr. Zager.
Argument by Mr. Long.
Rebuttal argument by Mr. Zager.
Statements by Mr. Simons.
11:19 a.m.
Further argument by Mr. Long.
ORDERED:
Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor
Danek Co., Ltd. and Medtronic PS Medical, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[168] /[177], is taken under advisement.
11:25 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 55 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?