Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 263

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Telephonic Status Conference held on 3/10/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation's Opposed Request for Certified, Original Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court 258 is GRANTED. Defendant will inquire if an annotated original including two additional parties is sufficient. Parties shall contact chambers of preferred form. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG Civil Action: Courtroom Deputy: 10-cv-02139-MSK-BNB Brandy Simmons Date: March 10, 2015 FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205 Parties Counsel LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL CORPORATION, George Stephen Long Nicole A. Westbrook Plaintiff, V MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INCORPORATED, MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD., David Clinton Lawrence Michael Simons Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE Court in Session: 4:06 p.m. Appearance of counsel. Parties discuss Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Opposed Request for Certified, Original Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court [258] filed March 6, 2015. For the reasons stated on the record, it is ORDERED: Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Opposed Request for Certified, Original Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court [258] is GRANTED. ORDERED: Defendant will inquire if an annotated original including two additional parties is sufficient. ORDERED: Parties shall contact chambers of preferred form. Court in Recess: 4:12 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:06 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?