Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Filing
263
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Telephonic Status Conference held on 3/10/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation's Opposed Request for Certified, Original Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court 258 is GRANTED. Defendant will inquire if an annotated original including two additional parties is sufficient. Parties shall contact chambers of preferred form. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:
10-cv-02139-MSK-BNB
Brandy Simmons
Date: March 10, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205
Parties
Counsel
LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL
CORPORATION,
George Stephen Long
Nicole A. Westbrook
Plaintiff,
V
MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK,
INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD.,
David Clinton Lawrence
Michael Simons
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE
Court in Session: 4:06 p.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Parties discuss Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Opposed Request for Certified, Original
Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court [258] filed March 6, 2015.
For the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED: Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Opposed Request for Certified,
Original Order to U.S. Consulate General in Japan be Signed by the Court
[258] is GRANTED.
ORDERED: Defendant will inquire if an annotated original including two additional
parties is sufficient.
ORDERED: Parties shall contact chambers of preferred form.
Court in Recess: 4:12 p.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 00:06
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?