Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Filing
356
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 291 Motion to Compel. Both Plaintiff Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporations Motion to StrikeDefendants Second Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses toPlaintiffs Complaint 296 and Defendants Moti on for Leave to AmendAnswer 324 are SUBMITTED and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Defendants Motion to Compel Production of Documents 291 is GRANTEDIN PART. Plaintiffs shall produce documents related to Request forProduction of Documents No. 53 including what the court defines as assets nolater than June 30, 2015. The court DENIES IN PART Defendants requestto compel further responses to Requests for Production Nos. 68 and 69. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6-29-15. (nywlc2.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:
10-cv-02139-MSK-NYW
Brandy Simmons
Date: June 24, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205
Parties
Counsel
LENOX MACLAREN SURGICAL
CORPORATION,
George Stephen Long
Nicole A. Westbrook
Plaintiff,
v
MEDTRONIC, INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK
INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC PS MEDICAL, INCORPORATED,
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK CO., LTD.,
Michael Simons
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 3:28 p.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Discussion and argument held on Plaintiff Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Motion to
Strike Defendants’ “Second Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s
Complaint” [296] filed on May 5, 2015, and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer
[324] filed on May 26, 2015.
ORDERED: Both Plaintiff Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation’s Motion to Strike
Defendants’ “Second Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to
Plaintiff’s Complaint” [296] and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend
Answer [324] are SUBMITTED and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.
Discussion and argument held on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents
[291] filed on May 4, 2015. Plaintiff’s’ counsel represents on the record that it has not sold or
otherwise assigned any claims or rights of recovery arising from this litigation, and no
responsive documents exist.
ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents [291] is GRANTED
IN PART. Plaintiffs shall produce documents related to Request for
Production of Documents No. 53 including what the court defines as assets no
later than June 30, 2015. The court DENIES IN PART Defendants’ request
to compel further responses to Requests for Production Nos. 68 and 69.
Parties advise the court of one remaining deposition which will likely occur after the discovery
cut-off, by agreement of the parties. The court advises that any such agreement must be
accomplished through a formal motion to the court.
Court in Recess: 4:07 p.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 00:39
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?