Robinette et al v. Schirard et al
Filing
96
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 72 Motion for Leave to Amend Amended Complaint and Join Parties and 84 Third Motion for Amended Complaint and Jury Demand on All Counts, and denying as moot 88 Motion to Strike, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/28/13.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02172-CMA-KLM
BONNER ROBINETTE, and
SHIRLEY ROBINETTE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SYDNEY “DUKE” SCHIRARD, Sheriff, La Plata County Colorado, in his individual and
professional capacities,
BOBBIE FENDER, in his individual and professional capacities,
AMBER FENDER, in her individual and professional capacities,
STEVE SCHMIDT, in his individual and professional capacities,
MELVIN SCHAFF, in his individual and professional capacities,
CHARLES HAMBY, in his individual and professional capacities, and
SEAN SMITH, in his individual and professional capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Amended
Complaint and Join Parties [Docket No. 72; Filed October 31, 2012]; on Plaintiffs’ Third
Motion for Amended Complaint and Jury Demand on All Counts [Docket No. 84; Filed
December 19, 2012] (collectively, the “Motions to Amend”); and on Defendants’ Motion to
Strike Plaintiffs’ Latest Amended Complaint [Docket No. 88; Filed January 9, 2013] (the
“Motion to Strike”). Based on entry of appearance by counsel on behalf of the formerly pro
se Plaintiffs,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Amend [#72, #84] are DENIED
without prejudice. If so desired, Plaintiffs’ counsel may file a new motion to amend on
or before February 27, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike [#88] is DENIED as moot.
Dated: January 28, 2013
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?