Robinette et al v. Schirard et al

Filing 96

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 72 Motion for Leave to Amend Amended Complaint and Join Parties and 84 Third Motion for Amended Complaint and Jury Demand on All Counts, and denying as moot 88 Motion to Strike, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/28/13.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02172-CMA-KLM BONNER ROBINETTE, and SHIRLEY ROBINETTE, Plaintiffs, v. SYDNEY “DUKE” SCHIRARD, Sheriff, La Plata County Colorado, in his individual and professional capacities, BOBBIE FENDER, in his individual and professional capacities, AMBER FENDER, in her individual and professional capacities, STEVE SCHMIDT, in his individual and professional capacities, MELVIN SCHAFF, in his individual and professional capacities, CHARLES HAMBY, in his individual and professional capacities, and SEAN SMITH, in his individual and professional capacities, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Amended Complaint and Join Parties [Docket No. 72; Filed October 31, 2012]; on Plaintiffs’ Third Motion for Amended Complaint and Jury Demand on All Counts [Docket No. 84; Filed December 19, 2012] (collectively, the “Motions to Amend”); and on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Latest Amended Complaint [Docket No. 88; Filed January 9, 2013] (the “Motion to Strike”). Based on entry of appearance by counsel on behalf of the formerly pro se Plaintiffs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Amend [#72, #84] are DENIED without prejudice. If so desired, Plaintiffs’ counsel may file a new motion to amend on or before February 27, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike [#88] is DENIED as moot. Dated: January 28, 2013 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?