Robinette et al v. Schirard et al

Filing 99

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 95 Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order and Stay Deadlines, and Request for Status Conference by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/30/13.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02172-CMA-KLM
BONNER ROBINETTE, and
SHIRLEY ROBINETTE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SYDNEY “DUKE” SCHIRARD, Sheriff, La Plata County Colorado, in his individual and
professional capacities,
BOBBIE FENDER, in his individual and professional capacities,
AMBER FENDER, in her individual and professional capacities,
STEVE SCHMIDT, in his individual and professional capacities,
MELVIN SCHAFF, in his individual and professional capacities,
CHARLES HAMBY, in his individual and professional capacities, and
SEAN SMITH, in his individual and professional capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order
and Stay Deadlines, and Request for Status Conference [Docket No. 95; Filed January
28, 2013] (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs provide insufficient information regarding their efforts to
comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634,
635-36 (D. Colo. 2003) (Rule 7.1A requires “meaningful negotiations” by the parties; “[t]he
rule is not satisfied by one party sending a single e-mail[, letter, or voice message] to
another party”). Plaintiffs merely state that “undersigned counsel attempted to confer with
Defendants’ counsel regarding this motion, but was unable to reach Defendants’ counsel.”
Motion [#95] at 2. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#95] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: January 30, 2013

-1-