Greenwood v. Maketa et al

Filing 52

ORDER: granting 49 Defendants Aramark and Brights Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/19/11.(bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02187-LTB-BNB
ROBERT A. GREENWOOD,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF TERRY MAKETA,
LT. HEINLE, EID #90022,
COMMANDER R. KING, EID #88010,
PROGRAMS MANAGER FRANK LAPAGE,
COMMANDER WILLIAM C. MISTRETTA, EID #74001,
ABRIGHT, Aramark, and
LT. BRANDT, EID #95011, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on Defendants Aramark and Bright’s Motion for Protective Order
Staying Discovery [Doc. #49, filed 09/09/2011] (the “Motion”). The Motion is GRANTED.
On August 16, 2011, the plaintiff served Aramark and Bright with Requests for
Production pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P. However, a scheduling conference has not yet
been held; no scheduling order has been entered; and discovery has not yet commenced.
Therefore, the plaintiff’s discovery requests are premature.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion [Doc. # 49] is GRANTED; and

(2)

Discovery is stayed pending a scheduling conference and the entry of a

scheduling order.

Dated September 19, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2