Green v. Potter

Filing 133

FINAL JUDGMENT re: 129 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Clerk on 2/7/13. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Case No. 10-cv-02201-LTB-KMT MARVIN GREEN, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Orders entered throughout the course of proceedings in this case, the following final judgment is hereby entered. I. PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Order entered by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock on October 28, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s First, Second, and Third Claims are DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. II. PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Order entered by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock on February 4, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Patrick R. Donahoe, and against Plaintiff, Marvin Green. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant, Patrick R. Donahoe shall have his costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen days of the entry of judgment. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 7th day of February, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?