Ali v. Eglinton et al

Filing 32

ORDER. The recommendation is accepted and Defendants Motion to Dismiss 27 is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/31/2011.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 10-cv-02236-LTB-KMT
ABDUR ALI, #14170,
Plaintiff,
v.
DRILL INSTRUCTOR EGLINGTON,
DRILL INSTRUCTOR ALLUISI,
DRILL INSTRUCTOR SODAMANN,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and
served on July 29, 2011 (Doc 31). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to
the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
(Doc 27) is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:

August 31, 2011