Raper et al v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. et al

Filing 11

MINUTE ORDER granting 6 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Vacate December 1, 2010 Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference is RESET for 12/21/2010 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty; Granting 9 Defe ndants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Defendants shall file their corporate disclosure statements on or before 12/14/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/24/2010. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02253-WYD-MEH JERAMIAH CHRISTOPHER RAPER and ANGELA RAPER, Plaintiffs, v. J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., PW EAGLE INC., d/b/a JM EAGLE, and JOHN DOES 1-2, whose true names and identities are unknown, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 24, 2010. Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement [filed November 23, 2010; docket #9] is granted. Defendants shall file their corporate disclosure statements on or before December 14, 2010. Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Vacate December 1, 2010 Scheduling Conference and Request to Reschedule the Conference [filed November 23, 2010; docket #6] is granted. The Scheduling Conference set for December 1, 2010, is vacated and reset to December 21, 2010, at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Lawyers whose offices are located outside of the Denver metropolitan area may appear at scheduling conferences by telephone. Please contact Chambers at [phone] at least five business days prior to the scheduling conference to arrange appearance by telephone. Lawyers appearing by telephone must ensure that the proposed Scheduling Order is filed electronically and by email no later than five business days prior to the scheduling conference, in accordance with the instructions in this minute order. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the parties in this case are to hold a prescheduling conference meeting and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before December 3, 2010. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), no discovery shall be submitted until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the Court. The parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.L., no later

than five (5) business days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in a useable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect only) by email to Magistrate Judge Hegarty at [e-mail]. Parties not participating in ECF shall file their proposed Scheduling Order on paper with the clerk's office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to file the proposed scheduling order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded from the Standardized Order Forms section of the Court's website, found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx. All Scheduling Conferences held before a Magistrate Judge utilize the same scheduling order format, regardless of the District Judge assigned to the case. Any out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.3C prior to the Scheduling Conference. The parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the Court will grant the relief requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a Court-ordered conference or to comply with a Court-ordered deadline which has not be vacated by Court order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Finally, the parties or counsel attending the Conference should be prepared to informally discuss settlement of the case. There is no requirement to submit confidential settlement documents/letters to the Court beforehand or to have parties present who shall have full authority to negotiate all terms and demands presented by the case. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B.

2