Lindquist v. Robinson et al
Filing
76
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 7/13/2011, granting in part and denying in part 72 Defendants' Motion to Stay Order 70 regarding Discovery Matter and D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02264-REB-MEH
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes
Date: July 13, 2011
FTR – Courtroom A501
DIANN LINDQUIST,
Mari Newman
Siddhartha Rathod
Lauren Fontana
Plaintiff,
vs.
ARAPAHOE COUNTY,
ARAPAHOE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,
GRAYSON ROBINSON,
JAMES COOK,
Edward Caswall
Breena Weng
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MOTION HEARING
Court in session:
9:58 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Argument and discussion regarding Defendants’ Motion to Stay Order (Doc. #70) regarding
Discovery Matter and D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification (Doc. #72, filed 7/8/11).
ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Stay Order (Doc. #70) regarding Discovery Matter and
D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification (Doc. #72, filed 7/8/11) is DENIED in part as
to Defendants' request to stay the effect of this Court's July 6, 2011 order pending
resolution of Defendants' objection to the order, but GRANTED in part to allow
Defendants an extension of time to July 26, 2011 within which to respond to
Plaintiff's discovery requests. The Court will further GRANT Defendants their
costs and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred in filing the motion to stay and for
their appearance today; Defendants' counsel shall file an affidavit supporting
such expenses on or before August 5, 2011. Plaintiff may object in writing to
the reasonableness of the costs and fees requested by Defendants on or before
August 15, 2011.
Court in recess:
10:36 a.m. (Hearing concluded)
Total time in court: 0:38
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?