Lindquist v. Robinson et al

Filing 76

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 7/13/2011, granting in part and denying in part 72 Defendants' Motion to Stay Order 70 regarding Discovery Matter and D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Civil Action No. 10-cv-02264-REB-MEH Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes Date: July 13, 2011 FTR – Courtroom A501 DIANN LINDQUIST, Mari Newman Siddhartha Rathod Lauren Fontana Plaintiff, vs. ARAPAHOE COUNTY, ARAPAHOE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GRAYSON ROBINSON, JAMES COOK, Edward Caswall Breena Weng Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MOTION HEARING Court in session: 9:58 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Argument and discussion regarding Defendants’ Motion to Stay Order (Doc. #70) regarding Discovery Matter and D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification (Doc. #72, filed 7/8/11). ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Stay Order (Doc. #70) regarding Discovery Matter and D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1 Certification (Doc. #72, filed 7/8/11) is DENIED in part as to Defendants' request to stay the effect of this Court's July 6, 2011 order pending resolution of Defendants' objection to the order, but GRANTED in part to allow Defendants an extension of time to July 26, 2011 within which to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests. The Court will further GRANT Defendants their costs and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred in filing the motion to stay and for their appearance today; Defendants' counsel shall file an affidavit supporting such expenses on or before August 5, 2011. Plaintiff may object in writing to the reasonableness of the costs and fees requested by Defendants on or before August 15, 2011. Court in recess: 10:36 a.m. (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 0:38

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?