Two Moms and a Toy, LLC v. International Playthings, LLC
Filing
273
AMENDED 272 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 270 Order, 271 Order. By Clerk on 10/30/12. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02271-PAB-BNB
TWO MOMS AND A TOY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PLAYTHINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
GOLOS WEISMAN DESIGN LTD., an Israel partnership, and
YOOKIDOO LTD., an Israel partnership
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
I.
Pursuant to the Order Regarding Claim Construction (Doc #270) of Judge
Philip A. Brimmer entered on October 24, 2012 it is
ORDERED that Defendant International Playthings, LLC’s Supplemental Motion
for Summary Judgment on its Counterclaim for Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,782,567
[Docket No. 167] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further
ORDERED that judgment shall enter in favor of defendant International
Playthings, LLC and against plaintiff Two Moms and a Toy, LLC on defendant’s
counterclaim that the United States Patent No. 6,782,567 is invalid as obvious pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. § 103.
II.
Pursuant to the Order (Doc #271) of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on
October 29, 2012 it is
ORDERED that plaintiff Two Moms and a Toy, LLC’s claims against defendants
Golos Weisman Design, Ltd and Yookidoo, Ltd. are dismissed without prejudice. It is
further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety. It is further
ORDERED that the defendant International Playthings, LLC is AWARDED costs,
to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and
D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 30th day of October, 2012.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/Edward Butler
Edward Butler
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?