OneSource Commercial Property Services, Inc. et al v. City and County of Denver et al

Filing 120

MINUTE ORDER denying 114 Plaintiffs' Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.56(d), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/17/2012.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02273-WJM-KLM
ONESOURCE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC., a Colorado corporation, and
AFFORDABLE SWEEPING, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation,
APRIL HENDERSON,
CALVIN BLACK,
KEN GREENE, and
XAVIER DURAN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
56(d) [Docket No. 114; Filed February 16, 2012] (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs ask the Court to
order production of certain emails identified in Defendants’ Amended Privilege Log for in
camera review, which Plaintiffs believe are necessary for formulating their responses to
Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [## 116, 117, 118]. This Court denied
Plaintiff’s Oral Motion to Compel Production of Documents Relating to a Privilege Log
(referring to emails) on August 15, 2011 [#87], and Plaintiffs filed an Objection to the Order
on August 26, 2011 [#89]. In the Motion at issue, Plaintiffs present no grounds for the
Court to reconsider its August 15, 2011 Order. To the extent that Plaintiffs seek
reconsideration of the August 15, 2011 Order,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. If Plaintiffs seek an extension
of time in which to file their responses to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [##
116, 117, 118] pending the District Judge’s adjudication of their August 26, 2011 Objection,
they may file a motion stating such request.
Dated: February 17, 2012