Barksdale v. Connaghan et al

Filing 28

ORDER - (1) Defendant Connaghan shall re-mail a copy of the Motion to Dismiss, doc # 22 to Mr. Barksdale at his current address; (2) At the Preliminary Scheduling Conference that will be held on 3/30/2011 at 10:00 a.m., the court will set a new deadline for Mr. Barksdale to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/15/2011. (cbscd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02491-CMA-CBS STEVEN BARKSDALE, Plaintiff, v. GENIE CONNAGHAN, PATRICIA PANEK (a/k/a) Patricia Rae, and AVALON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (d/b/a) PHOENIX CENTER, Defendants. ORDER Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff Mr. Barksdale's "Motion to Dismiss Defendant Motion to Dismiss [sic]" (filed March 11, 2011) (Doc. # 25), wherein he indicates that Defendant Connaghan failed to serve him at his current address with the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 22). The certificate of mailing for the Motion to Dismiss indicates that the Motion was not mailed to Mr. Barksdale's current address that was noted in the December 15, 2010 Change of Address (Doc. # 12). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Connaghan shall re-mail a copy of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 22) to Mr. Barksdale at his current address. 2. At the Preliminary Scheduling Conference that will be held on March 30, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., the court will set a new deadline for Mr. Barksdale to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss. 1 DATED at Denver, Colorado this 15th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?