Jackson v. Shinseik et al

Filing 66

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 5/11/2011. ORDERED: The Emergency Motion to Effectuate Service, doc # 57 is DENIED AS MOOT. Discovery will remain STAYED pending a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, doc # 51 . By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action No.: 10-cv-02596-MSK-CBS Date: May 11, 2011 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Linda Kahoe DAVID JACKSON, Pro se Plaintiff, v. ERIC KEN SHINSEKI, et al., Jamie L. Mendelson Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in session: 10:20 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance of counsel. Mr. Jackson states he was late due to delays with public transportation. The court admonishes Mr. Jackson to appear on time for court hearings. Discussion regarding Emergency Motion to Effectuate Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendants, doc #[57] filed 4/19/2011. The court accepts the government’s concession that all Defendants have been properly served. ORDERED: The Emergency Motion to Effectuate Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendants, doc #[57], is DENIED as MOOT. The court states that the Motion to Dismiss, doc #[51], has not been referred. Ms. Mendelson states that the court issued an Order staying discovery pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss. Mr. Jackson objects to the current stay of discovery. ORDERED: Mr. Jackson’s objection is overruled. Discovery will remain STAYED pending a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, doc #[51]. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: Total time in court: 10:59 a.m. 00:39 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?