Barela v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp.
Filing
21
Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 11/3/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Mr. Martin and Laura Black's depositions shall be taken at the defendant's expense. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions 15 , is denied. Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Expert Witness Deadline for Good Cause 16 , is granted.(FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
November 3, 2011
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02616-RPM
DAVID BARELA,
Donna E. Dell’Olio
Plaintiff,
v.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
Patricia A. Fennelly
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Pending Motions
1:51 p.m.
Court in session.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
Court’s statement regarding the issue of plaintiff ‘s technical competents to perform assigned duties and
evaluators.
Ms. Fennelly answers questions asked by the Court regarding Mr. Martin and discovery.
Ms. Fennelly states Mr. Martin is now retired from Northrop Grumman Systems, Corp.
2:06 p.m.
2:14 p.m.
Argument by Ms. Dell’Olio.
Argument by Ms. Fennelly.
ORDERED:
Mr. Martin and Laura Black’s depositions shall be taken at the defendant’s
expense.
2:24 p.m.
Further argument by Ms. Dell’Ollio.
ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [15], is denied.
Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Expert Witness Deadline
for Good Cause [16], is granted.
2:26 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 35 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?