Burns v. Buford et al
Filing
51
Minute ORDER denying 50 Motion to waive filing fee or monthly payment. Mr. Burns continues to have 30 days from the 2/13 order in which to comply with all the directives of the 2/13 order, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/22/12.(lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02691-LTB
DOUGLAS BURNS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. STACEY BUFORD,
JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General,
R.N. WOLFF,
LT. M. MEEHAN,
TED LAURANCE, P.A.,
DR. AASEN,
DR. VAHIL,
P.A. TEJINDER SINGH,
NURSE OR P.A. JOHN AND JANE DOES, at DWCF Infirmary,
RUDY HERRERA, and
JOHN DAVIS,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK
On February 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to waive filing fee or monthly
payment (ECF No. 50). The motion is DENIED. Plaintiff already was informed in the
order of November 4, 2010 (ECF No. 2), which granted him leave to proceed in forma
pauperis pursuant to ยง 1915, that he would be required to pay the full amount of the
$350.00 filing fee through monthly payments or show cause each month as directed in
the November 4 order why he has no assets and no means by which to make the
monthly payment. The Order Directing Plaintiff to Supplement the Record (ECF No.
48), entered on February 13, 2012, reminded Mr. Burns of this obligation. If Mr. Burns
is unable to make a monthly payment, he has the option to show cause as directed in
the November 4 order why he is unable to do so.
Mr. Burns continues to have thirty (30) days from the February 13 order in
which to comply with all the directives of the February 13 order.
Dated: February 22, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?