Lilly v. Hartley et al
Filing
52
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Hear and to Clarify the Order Entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Hegarty on the 16th Day of August 2011, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/25/2011. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02738-REB-MEH
CURTIS L. LILLY,
Plaintiff,
v.
MR. JASON FASSLER, Correctional Officer, Fremont Correctional Facility, and
MR. ROBERT BEAUMONT, Correction Officer, Fremont Correctional Facility,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 25, 2011.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Re-Hear and to Clarify the Order Entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge
Hegarty on the 16th Day of August 2011 [filed August 24, 2011; docket #50] is granted in part and
denied in part. The motion is granted only to clarify that the Court’s August 16, 2011 order denied
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint without prejudice because the
motion did not include an attached proposed Second Amended Complaint as required. Because the
motion was denied without prejudice, the Plaintiff is free to re-file a motion for leave to amend, but
he must attach to the motion a proposed Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is
directed to send with this minute order a form prisoner complaint to the Plaintiff for his use, if he
so chooses to seek leave to amend.
The Court will also clarify for the Plaintiff that this Court did not grant him leave to file a
Second Amended Complaint with its July 21, 2011 Recommendation but, rather, merely
recommended that the District Judge, the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, grant the Plaintiff leave
to file an amended complaint. Judge Blackburn has yet issued no order on the recommendation.
Therefore, it is proper at this stage of the litigation that the Plaintiff, if he so chooses, seek the
court’s leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by filing a motion.
All other relief sought by the present motion is denied.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?