Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dalton et al

Filing 98

ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for an Expedited Status Conference Regardingthe Status of the 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, Property 97 filed 1/26/2012, is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. An Amended Default Judgment SHALL BE ISSUED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/22/2012.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn 10-cv-02794-REB-KLM SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CONSULTING RESOURCES LLC, and RICHARD DALTON, Defendants, and MARIE DALTON, Relief Defendant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED STATUS CONFERENCE RE: 927 COLE STREET PROPERTY Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Expedited Status Conference Regarding the Status of the 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, Property [#97]1 filed January 26, 2012. The motion is granted on the terms stated in this order. On December 1, 2011, I entered an order [#89] granting the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against relief defendant, Marie Dalton. Accordingly, on December 7, 2011, Default Judgment [#93] entered against relief defendant, Marie Dalton. Both the 1 “[#97]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. order [#89] and the Default Judgment [#93] contain provisions requiring the appointment of a receiver to sell real property owned by Marie Dalton, which property is located at 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado (the Cole Street Property). Concurrent with the above-captioned case, an in rem civil forfeiture action concerning the Cole Street Property is pending in this court. United States v. 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, et al., Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106- PAB-CBS (D. Colo.). In addition, a criminal case is pending against Richard Dalton and Marie Dalton. United States v. Richard Dalton and Marie Dalton, Criminal Case No. 11-mj-01126–BNB (D. Colo.) All three cases concern allegations that the Richard Dalton ran a scheme that fraudulently raised over 17 million dollars from 130 investors in 13 states. In the case at bar, Marie Dalton is named as a relief defendant only. In the in rem case and in the criminal case, Marie Dalton is alleged to have operated the fraudulent scheme with Richard Dalton. With regard to the Cole Street Property, the Default Judgment [#93] in this case provides at paragraph seven (7): That on the joint recommendation of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Colorado, a receiver SHALL BE APPOINTED to sell the property owned by Marie Dalton located at 927 Cole Street in Golden, Jefferson County, Colorado; In paragraph eight (8), the Default Judgment provides also for disposition of the proceeds of the sale, once a sale is completed. Default Judgment [#93], pp. 3-4. In December, 2011, the United States determined that the Cole Street Property had been abandoned and was in danger of deterioration due to adverse weather conditions. A judge in the in rem action granted the United States a writ of entry for the property. Pursuant to that writ, the Internal Revenue Service secured the property. On January 25, 2012, the court in the in rem action held a post-seizure hearing and status 2 conference. At the hearing, Marie Dalton was represented by appointed counsel. The minutes of the hearing state that an agreement has been reached with Marie Dalton and that corresponding asset forfeiture paperwork would be filed by the parties. United States v. 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, et al., Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106PAB-CBS (D. Colo.), Minutes [#34] filed January 25, 2012. In its present motion, the SEC asks, in effect, that the provisions of the Default Judgment [#93] be amended to permit the Cole Street Property to be sold by the Internal Revenue Service rather than by a receiver. The SEC represents that a sale by the Internal Revenue Service might reduce transaction costs related to the sale of the property. I agree with the SEC’s suggestion. The in rem proceeding, United States v. 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, et al., Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106- PAB-CBS (D. Colo.), is a proceeding designed specifically to deal with asset forfeiture and sale of a forfeited asset. Ms. Dalton is represented by counsel in that proceeding, but is not represented by counsel in this case. The record in the in rem proceeding shows that Ms. Dalton has agreed to a forfeiture of the Cole Street Property. As a result, the in rem proceeding is the most efficient means by which issues concerning the sale of the Cole Street Property can be resolved. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Expedited Status Conference Regarding the Status of the 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, Property [#97] filed January 26, 2012, is GRANTED on the terms stated in this order; 2. That an Amended Default Judgment SHALL BE ISSUED in this case; 3. That the terms of the Amended Default Judgment shall be identical to the 3 terms of the extant Default Judgment [#93], except that paragraph seven (7) of the Default Judgment [#93] shall be deleted and replaced with the language specified below; 4. That hereafter paragraph seven (7) of the Amended Default Judgment shall read as follows: That the property owned by Marie Dalton located at 927 Cole Street in Golden, Jefferson County, Colorado, SHALL BE SOLD as directed by the court in United States v. 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, et al., Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106- PAB-CBS (D. Colo.); 5. That once an Amended Default Judgment is filed in this case the original Default Judgment [#93] SHALL BE supplanted and superseded by the Amended Default Judgment; 6. That otherwise, the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Expedited Status Conference Regarding the Status of the 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado, Property [#97] filed January 26, 2012, is DENIED. Dated February 22, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?