Oilman International, FZCO v. Neer et al

Filing 89

MINUTE ORDER; granting in part and denying in part 87 Unopposed Motion to Vacate Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Deadline to File the Proposed Final Pre-Trial Order. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/17/2012. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 1/23/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/20/11.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02810-PAB-BNB OILMAN INTERNATIONAL, FZCO, Plaintiff, v. MARVIN BRUCE NEER d/b/a TREE MACHINES, and JESUSA S. NEER a/k/a JESUSA S. BARTOLOME, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Vacate Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Deadline to File the Proposed Final Pre-Trial Order [docket no. 87, filed December 19, 2011] (the “Motion”). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Pretrial Conference will go forward but the date will be changed to accommodate calendar conflicts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for January 10, 2012, is vacated and reset to January 23, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.4.0., is due on or before January 17, 2012. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. DATED: December 20, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?