Carbajal v. Warner et al

Filing 377

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 357 Petition for Federal Injunction and denying as moot 359 Motion to Set Hearing. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/11/12.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02862-REB-KLM
DEAN CARBAJAL,
Plaintiff,
v.
MYRL SERRA, in his individual capacity,
SHERRI PRICE, in her individual capacity,
CAROL WARNER, in her individual capacity,
DAVID ROMERO, in his individual capacity,
JOE QUINTANA, in his individual capacity,
BILL RAILEY, in his individual capacity,
CHRIS WELDON, in his individual capacity,
BENJAMIN SCHROEDER, in his individual capacity,
GILBERTO LUCIO, in his individual capacity,
JAMES DIXON, in his individual capacity,
ADAM BARRETT, in his individual capacity,
JOEL SMITH, in his individual capacity,
JESSE REMBERT, in his individual capacity,
JAY LOPEZ, in his individual capacity,
MICHAEL O’NEILL, in his individual capacity,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF DELTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Colorado,
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado,
DARIN DESEL, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his individual
capacity,
FRED MCKEE, Sheriff for the Delta Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity,
PERRY SPEELMAN, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his individual
capacity, and
UNKNOWN REPRESENTATIVE, Representative of Patricia Kramer’s Estate, former
Deputy District Attorney for the Seventh Judicial District, in her individual capacity,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
-1-

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Federal Injunction
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 [Docket No. 357; Filed August 8, 2012] (the “Petition”) and
on Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Hearing [Docket No. 359; Filed August 8, 2012] (the “Motion”).
On September 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Corrected Petition for Federal Injunction Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 [#375] (the “Corrected Petition”). Plaintiff has not yet sought a hearing
in conjunction with the Corrected Petition, but he states that he will be filing such a request.
Corrected Petition [#375] at 31. In light of the Corrected Petition,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition [#357] and the Motion [#359] are
DENIED as moot.

Dated: September 11, 2012

-2-