Carbajal v. Warner et al

Filing 711

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/20/15. # 672 Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-02862-REB-KLM DEAN CARBAJAL, Plaintiff, v. CAROL WARNER, in her individual capacity, DAVID ROMERO, in his individual capacity, JOE QUINTANA, in his individual capacity, BILL RAILEY, in his individual capacity, CHRIS WELDON, in his individual capacity, BENJAMIN SCHROEDER, in his individual capacity, GILBERTO LUCIO, in his individual capacity, JAMES DIXON, in his individual capacity, ADAM BARRETT, in his individual capacity, JOEL SMITH, in his individual capacity, JESSE REMBERT, in his individual capacity, JAY LOPEZ, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL O’NEILL, in his individual capacity, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, DARIN DESEL, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, FRED MCKEE, Sheriff for the Delta Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity, PERRY SPEELMAN, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, and JEFFREY WATTS, Investigator for the Second Judicial District, in his individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the Delta Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [#672] (the “Motion”). Plaintiff filed a Response [#691] in opposition to the Motion, and the Delta Defendants filed a Reply [#709]. On March 5, 2015, a Status Conference was held in which additional discovery was permitted by the Court. See [#643]. A deadline -1- of June 6, 2015 was set for the completion of all discovery. Plaintiff mailed additional discovery requests to the Delta Defendants on May 15, 2015. See Envelope [#672-2] at 14. A party has thirty days to respond to written discovery requests after service, and service is effective the day the requests are mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), 33(b)(2), 34(b)(2)(A), 36(a)(3). Thus, at the earliest, the Delta Defendants’ responses to the written discovery were due on June 14, 2015. Plaintiff therefore did not serve his written discovery requests on the Delta Defendants in a timely manner, i.e., thirty days or more before the discovery deadline. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#672] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), insofar as the Delta Defendants need not respond to Plaintiff Dean Carbajal’s Second Set of Written Discovery Requests To The Delta Defendants [#672-2]. The Motion is denied without prejudice to the extent the Delta Defendants also seek expenses, including attorney fees, they have incurred in connection with the Motion. Any request for attorney fees shall first comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3. Dated: July 20, 2015 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?