Miller v. Heil et al
Filing
140
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Complaint and Action 139 is GRANTED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/22/12. (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02913-WYD-BNB
CHRISTOPHER JON MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARGARET HEIL, in her Official Capacity as Program Administrator of the SOTMP and
Chief of Rehabilitation Programs;
RICHARD G. LINS, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as SOTMP Therapist, and
Litigation Coordinator;
CHRISTINA ORTIZ-MARQUEZ, Individually, and in her Official Capacity as SOTMP
Therapist;
SAMUEL MICHAEL DUNLAP, in his Official Capacity as SOTMP Phase II Program
Coordinator;
BURL MCCULLAR, in his Official Capacity as SOTMP Program Manager;
ARISTEDES ZAVAR[A]S, in his Official Capacity as Executive Director;
CHRISTINE TYLER, Individually, and in her Official Capacity as SOTMP Therapist; and
JAYLYNNE CHUPP, in her Official Capacity as SOTMP Therapist,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Voluntary
Dismissal of Complaint and Action filed March 19, 2012. After a careful review of the
motion and the file, I find that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted. I further find that this
case should be dismissed with prejudice as Plaintiff asserts in the motion that he no
longer has the time, wherewithal, resources, or desire to prosecute this action.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of
Complaint and Action (ECF No. 139) is GRANTED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2)
and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Dated: March 22, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Chief United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?