Nagim v. Walker et al

Filing 65

MINUTE ORDER striking 62 Motion to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/04/11.(jjh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02973-WYD-KLM
RONALD J. NAGIM,
Plaintiff,
v.
RAY WALKER, and
UNIVERSAL PERSONNEL,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s second “Motion to Show Cause”
[Docket No. 62; Filed October 3, 2011] (the “Motion”). Although titled and docketed as a
Motion, the pleading purports to inform the Court of the content of certain discovery
responses received by Plaintiff. No relief is requested.
Plaintiff submitted a similar filing on July 25, 2011 [Docket No. 56] (“July 25, 2011
filing”). In the Minute Order denying the July 25, 2011 filing, the Court informed Plaintiff
that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.5, discovery-related matters
should not be filed on the docket unless relief is specifically being sought from the Court.
The Court warned Plaintiff that future unnecessary pleadings may be summarily denied,
stricken or ignored. Accordingly, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1H,1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is STRICKEN.
Dated: October 4, 2011

1

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1H provides that “[a] verbose, redundant, ungrammatical, or
unintelligible motion, response, or reply may be stricken or returned for revision, and its filing may
be grounds for imposing sanctions.”