Miller v. Foltz

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER granting 33 Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/22/2011.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 10–cv–02992–MSK–KMT CLIFFORD MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ERIC FOLTZ, M.D., Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA In light of “Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Scheduling Order” (Doc. No. 36, filed Sept. 21, 2011), “Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Scheduling Order” (Doc. No. 33, filed September 15, 2011) is GRANTED. The Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline is extended to November 18, 2011. However, to the extent that the parties wish to further extend the Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline or extend any of the other deadlines indicated in Defendant’s Response, the parties must file a renewed motion to amend the scheduling order. See D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1C (“A motion shall not be included in a response or reply to the original motion. A motion shall be made in a separate paper.”) Dated: September 22, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?