Scarborough v. StarTek, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER. The recommendation is accepted and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based upon the Plaintiffs failure to appear, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is directed to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, incurred by the Defendant based upon the Plaintiffs failure to appear for the 9/27/2011, settlement conference. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/10/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 10-cv-03017-LTB-MJW MERNA J. SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff, v. STARTEK, INC., Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on October 25, 2011 (Doc 25). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based upon the Plaintiff’s failure to appear, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to prosecute. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is directed to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, incurred by the Defendant based upon the Plaintiff’s failure to appear for the September 27, 2011, settlement conference. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: November 10, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?