Ressler et al v. Boeing Company, Inc., The et al
Filing
109
PROTECTIVE ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/14/11. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-03050-REB-BNB
(Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 10-cv-03051-REB-BNB, 11-cv-01832-REB-BNB, 11-cv01874-REB-BNB, and 11-cv-02253-REB-BNB)
REGINA RESSLER, and
RANDY RESSLER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of Practice
of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado - Civil, this Confidentiality
Agreement and Protective Order governs the disclosure of non-public Confidential Information,
Trade Secrets, and Proprietary Information (as defined below), which are collectively referred to
in this Order as “Confidential Material.” “Confidential Material” includes that material
subject to protection pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) and by law.
Definitions
a.
b.
1
“Confidential Information” includes Trade Secrets, financial and commercial
information not publicly known, and personally sensitive information, including,
without limitation, information concerning settlement agreements, confidential
medical and health information, and information protected by the Privacy Act.
“Trade Secrets” constitute information that is used in one’s business and which
gives one an opportunity to obtain an advantage over a competitor. It may
include a formula, design, pattern, compilation, analysis, program, device,
manual, technique or process.
c.
“Proprietary Information” includes Trade Secrets, plans for development,
products and services; marketing, selling and business plans; budgets
unpublished financial statements; manuals; strategies; training methods
techniques; non-public studies; and information regarding the skills
compensation of company employees.
new
and
and
and
The Court hereby orders that:
1.
Confidential Material shall not be used for any other purpose than this Litigation,
including any business or commercial purpose.
2..
Previously-designated Confidential Material shall be filed with the Court only as
provided in D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2, except as allowed or instructed by the Court. Before filing
material that has not been previously designated as “Confidential,” but which the offering party
believes may fall under the definitions of Confidential Material herein, the offering party shall
give the Producing Party three (3) business days notice so that the Producing Party may have the
opportunity to designate the material as “Confidential” as described below. If the offering party
must file the materials before the materials are or are not designated as “Confidential,” the
offering party shall file the materials under seal pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2., and the
Producing Party shall follow the procedures in the Rule.
3.
The designation of Confidential Material as “Confidential” shall be made by
stamping each page of the Confidential Material with the legend “Confidential” prior to its
production. Confidential Material shall be kept confidential by the receiving parties and shall
not be disclosed in any manner to any person, except as provided in this Order. Designations
2
shall be made in good faith and limited to information that, if improperly disclosed, has a risk of
causing significant harm.
4.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of Confidential Material, the
deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as “Confidential” and shall be subject to the
provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the
deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as
“Confidential” after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is given to all
counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of
the transcript.
5.
Except as otherwise required by law, and until further order of the Court,
Confidential Material designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Order shall be
disseminated or disclosed only to the following persons:
a.
b.
Attorneys employed or retained by a party to this Litigation and the attorneys’
staff, consultants, contractors and vendors who are providing services directly
related to the Litigation;
c.
Officers, directors, representatives, and employees of a party who are directly
involved in this Litigation, including in-house counsel and representatives of a
party’s insurer;
d.
The Court and its employees, including court reporters or others associated with
the Court through the trial of this Litigation; and
e.
Witnesses (either at deposition or at trial), solely to the extent necessary to assist
in the conduct of the Litigation and in accordance with the terms of this Order.
f.
3
Any party to this Litigation, solely to the extent necessary to assist in the conduct
of the Litigation in accordance with the terms of this Order;
Experts and consultants who are necessary to assist counsel in the conduct of this
Litigation, and their staff employees and colleagues working within the same
office or practice; provided, however, that Confidential Material shall not be
disclosed to any expert or consultant, whether he testifies as a witness or not,
unless the person receiving Confidential Material agrees to abide by the terms and
conditions of this Order, by signing the confidentiality statement in the form
attached as Exhibit A. All such acknowledgements shall be retained by counsel
and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is
demonstrated by opposing counsel.
It is expressly understood and agreed that no party will provide Confidential Material to any
other person besides those listed above. Every person given access to Confidential Material
shall be advised that the Confidential Material is being disclosed pursuant and subject to the
terms of this Order and may not be disclosed other than pursuant to the terms of this Order.
6.
This Order shall not be construed to prevent examination of any person as a
witness at trial or during deposition. Moreover, this Order shall not be construed to prevent
examination of any person as a witness at trial or during deposition concerning any Confidential
Material that the witness had lawfully received prior to and apart from this lawsuit.
7.
A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential Material by
giving written notice to the party designating the disputed material. The written notice
shall identify the material to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the
objection within fourteen days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation
of the party designating the material as “Confidential” to file an appropriate motion
requesting that the court determine whether the disputed material should be subject to the
terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed material shall
be treated as “Confidential” under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules
on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed
time, the disputed material shall lose its designation as “Confidential” and shall not
thereafter be treated as “Confidential” in accordance with this Protective Order. In
4
connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the material as
“Confidential” shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed
material to be treated as “Confidential.”
Any party may challenge the confidential status of a document that has been produced by
another party. If a Receiving Party objects to the classification of any document as
“Confidential,” the Receiving Party shall state its objection and the basis therefore in writing for
each such document to the Producing Party, with notice to all parties. Within fourteen (14) days
of receipt of such objection, the Producing Party shall reply in writing. Interested counsel shall
then confer concerning any such dispute, and if an agreement cannot be reached, the Producing
Party shall, within ten (10) days from the date either party declares an impasse (in writing to all
parties), apply to the Court for a ruling to determine if a document (or category of documents)
designated as “Confidential” is entitled to such status and protection. Pending a ruling by the
Court on the motion, this Order shall remain in effect. Nothing in this Order should be construed
to shift the burden away from a party claiming confidential status to prove to the Court that the
materials are entitled to confidential status under the law. If the Producing Party fails to make
application with the Court within the prescribed period, the specified materials will lose their
confidential status.
8.
This Order shall, absent written permission of the Producing Party, or further
order of the Court, continue to be binding throughout and after the conclusion of the Litigation,
including without limitation any appeals. Counsel for the parties agree to be bound by this Order
after the conclusion of the Litigation, as evidenced by their signatures below. At the termination
of this Litigation, each receiving party shall return to (or dispose of as may be directed by)
5
counsel for the Producing Party, all Confidential Materials produced by that party and a copy of
all agreements signed pursuant to Paragraph 3. Where the parties agree to destroy Confidential
Materials, the destroying party shall provide all parties with an affidavit confirming the
destruction.
9.
Nothing contained in this Order, nor any action taken in compliance with it, shall:
(1) operate as an admission by the Producing Party that the Confidential Material is admissible
in evidence or at trial; or (2) prevent the Producing Party from using or disclosing the
Confidential Material for any purpose. If the Producing Party makes the material public, the
material will lose its protection under this Order.
10
In the event that any Confidential Material is used in any court proceeding in this
Litigation or any appeal therefrom, other than as admitted evidence, said Confidential Material
shall not lose its status as Confidential Material through such use except as provided for in D.C.
Colo. LCivR.7.2B.
11.
This Order shall govern all documents, information, and other materials
designated by the Producing Party to be “Confidential,” as specifically defined by this Order,
unless a separate protective order has been entered to specifically address a document or
category of documents, in which case the more specific protective order will govern.
12.
In the event additional parties join or are joined in this Litigation, they shall also
be bound by this order.
13.
This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause
shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.
6
Dated November 14, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
7
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ John H. Martin
John H. Martin
Attorney-in-charge
Texas State Bar No. 13086500
Jennifer P. Henry
Texas State Bar No. 15859500
David C. Schulte
Texas State Bar No. 24037456
THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201-2533
214-969-1700
Fax: 214-969-1751
John.Martin@tklaw.com
Jennifer.Henry@tklaw.com
David.Schulte@tklaw.com
/s/ Henry Brotherton Goddard, Jr.
Henry Brotherton Goddard, Jr.
Senior Trial Counsel
Colleen L. Conlin
Edmund Ferguson
Trial Attorneys
Mark Thomas Clouatre
Habib Nasrullah
WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL, LLP
1801 California Street, Suite 3600
Denver, CO 80202-2617
303-244-1800
Fax: 303-244-1879
nasrullah@wtotrial.com
clouatre@wtotrial.com
Mark S. Pestal
Assistant United States Attorney
mark.pestal@usdoj.gov
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF,
GLOBAL AEROSPACE, INC.
8
U.S. Department of Justice
Torts Branch, Civil Division
P.O. Box 14271
Washington, D.C. 20044-4271
(202) 616-4055
Fax: (202) 616-4002
Henry.Goddard@usdoj.gov
Colleen.Conlin@usdoj.gov
Edmund.Ferguson@usdoj.gov
Mark Tomicich, Of Counsel
Federal Aviation Administration
Litigation Division, AGC-400
600 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20591
(202) 385-8225
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT,
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
/s/ Frances Margaret Phares
Frances Margaret Phares
BAUM, HEDLUND, ARISTEI & GOLDMAN, P.C.
12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90025
(310) 207-3233
Fax: (310) 820-7444
fphares@baumhedlundlaw.com
Patricia M. Jarzobski
LAW OFFICES OF PATRICIA M. JARZOBSKI, P.C.
501 South Cherry Street, #610
Denver, CO 80246-1328
(303) 322-3344
Fax: (303) 322-6644
zobski@msn.com
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS,
RANDY RESSLER, REGINA RESSLER,
ALBERT FELIPE AND MEAGAN FELIPE
/s/ Bruce A. Lampert
Bruce A. Lampert
KATZMAN, LAMPERT & MCCLUNE
9596 Metro Airport Ave., 2nd Fl
Broomfield, CO 80021-2731
(303) 465-3663
(303) 465-3884
blampert@klm-law.com
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS,
DANIELA ESCUDERO CONTAG, KEITH DALICK,
JULIE HART, DAVID KHADEM, EMMA KHADEM,
FRANCIS KHADEM, MINA KHADEM, ROBERT
MALLOY, JARED MARTIN, THUY NYUGEN, LAURA
RIVAS-VALERO, CAREY MEGAN SCHARFENSTINE,
GREYSON COLE SCHARFENSTINE, LLOYD COLIN
SCHARFENSTINE, MICHAEL STEVENS, ELIJAH
GABRIEL TREJOS, GABRIEL TREJOS, MARIA
TREJOS, JOLENE VARLEY, JAMES WARREN,
JESSICA WARREN
9
/s/ Jason Aaron Gibson
Jason Aaron Gibson
THE GIBSON LAW FIRM
4400 Louisiana Street
The Lyric Centre, Suite 2050
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 650-1010
Fax: (713) 650-1011
jag@jag-lawfirm.com
Bruce A. Lampert
KATZMAN, LAMPERT & MCCLUNE
9596 Metro Airport Ave., 2nd Fl
Broomfield, CO 80021-2731
(303) 465-3663
(303) 465-3884
blampert@klm-law.com
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS,
KRISTINA BEAGLE, MELISSA CRAFT, AUBREY
DEMPSEY, CRYSTAL DEMPSEY, DEBRALYNN
DEMPSEY, ALEXANDER GORHAM, NICHOLAS
HAMRA, KENNETH KELLY, LEAH KELLY, SANDRA
KELLY, JACLYN MCLEAN, JAMES E. MCLEAN,
JAMES E. MCLEAN, JR., JOSEF MCLEAN, THERESA
MCLEAN, JESSICA MUTSCHLER, EMILY
PELLEGRINI, GERARDO IVAN RANERO, A MINOR,
MARK REYNA, GLORIA SANCHEZ, DANIEL
TAKAMI
EXHIBIT A
[Name and Address of
Proposed Recipient of
Confidential Material]
[Name and Address of Counsel
Proposing to Show Confidential
Material to a Third Party]
Re:
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-03050-REB-BNB (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 10-cv03051-REB-BNB, 11-cv-01832-REB-BNB, 11-cv-01874-REB-BNB, and 11-cv-02253REB-BNB), Regina Ressler, and Randy Ressler, et al v. United States of America
pending in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
Dear Counsel:
You have proposed to disclose to me the confidential and/or proprietary information,
which has been designated as “Confidential” in the above-referenced litigation. This will
acknowledge:
I have reviewed a copy of the Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order (the
“Order”) in the above-referenced action.
I agree to comply with the Order in all respects.
I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado, for adjudication of any dispute about whether I have complied with the Order.
[Signature of Proposed Recipient of the confidential
and/or proprietary information]
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?