Rueb v. Brown et al

Filing 17

MINUTE ORDER denying 15 Plaintiff's "Motion to Alter and Amend Judgement (and Combined Motion to Amend Complaint)," by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/11/2011. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03071-REB-MEH
JUSTIN RUEB, a/k/a Justin Joseph Rueb,
Plaintiff,
v.
BROWN,
BURBANK, DENNIS,
DOE (3 “John Doe” mailroom officers),
JONES, SUSAN, and
ZAVARAS, ARISTEDES,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 11, 2011.
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Alter and Amend Judgement (and Combined Motion to Amend
Complaint)” [filed April 8, 2011; docket #15] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff does not
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G, requiring the inclusion of a
certificate of service with any filing. Additionally, Plaintiff submits two separate requests for relief
in one motion. One of these requests is a motion to amend complaint; however, Plaintiff does not
include a proposed Amended Complaint for the Court’s (and Defendants’) review. If Plaintiff
chooses to re-file a motion for leave to amend, he must include a proposed Amended Complaint.