Wollam et al v. Wright Medical Group, Inc. et al

Filing 57

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on April 25, 2011: ORDERED: The Motion for Protective Order 41 is DENIED AS MOOT, the date of the deposition having elapsed. ORDERED: The deposition of Dr. Daniel M. Ward sha ll be completed by May 19, 2011, at a date and time as the parties may agree. The deposition shall occur in Massachusetts, at the place of business or residence of the deponent. ORDERED: The Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel [Doc No. 44] is DENIED AS MOOT.(FTR: BNB) (wjmcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND Civil Action No. 10-cv-03104-DME-BNB Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen Date: April 25, 2011 FTR BNB COURTROOM A-401 GLENN A. WOLLAM; and BONNIE J. SHOENSTEIN, George E. McLaughlin Plaintiffs, v. WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, et al., Daniel S. Wittenberg Deanne C. McClung Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES HEARING on Motion for Protective Order Court in session: 08:30 a.m. Court’s opening remarks. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ward’s Motion for Protective Order [Doc No. 41]. Appearances of counsel. Argument presented. ORDERED: The Motion for Protective Order [Doc No. 41] is DENIED AS MOOT, the date of the deposition having elapsed. ORDERED: The deposition of Dr. Daniel M. Ward shall be completed by May 19, 2011, at a date and time as the parties may agree. The deposition shall occur in Massachusetts, at the place of business or residence of the deponent. Further comments by Mr. McLaughlin Plaintiffs withdraw their Motion to Compel which is set for hearing in June, 2011, related to Dr. Ward. ORDERED: The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [Doc No. 44] is DENIED AS MOOT. Court in Recess 08:47 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: /17 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?