Hollingshead v. Stanley Works, The et al

Filing 80

JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of John S. Hollingshead against Aetna Life Insurance Company, Stanley Works Long Term Disability Plan, The re: 79 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees and costs, Plaintiff is awarded a total of $28,976.44 in attor neys fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall pay the sum awarded to Plaintiff on or before January 11, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Prejudgment Interest is DENIED, by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 12/14/2012. (ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-03124-WJM-CBS JOHN S. HOLLINGSHEAD, Plaintiff, v. THE STANLEY WORKS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the orders entered in this case, the following JUDGMENT is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Prejudgment Interest (ECF No. 79) entered by Judge William J. Martinez on December 11, 2012, which order is incorporated by reference, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Prejudgment Interest (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is awarded a total of $28,976.44 in attorney’s fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall pay the sum awarded to Plaintiff on or before January 11, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Prejudgment Interest is DENIED. As all other claims have been dismissed by order, stipulation, or settlement, this case is considered CLOSED. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of December, 2012. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?