Meaux et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Second Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/30/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 10/1/2012, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/27/12.(lsw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 10–cv–03160–RBJ–KMT
TONIA MEAUX, and
JAMIE MEAUX,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
The parties’ “Second Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order” (Doc. No. 28, filed Feb.
24, 2012) is GRANTED. The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel
with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) no later than June 18, 2012. The parties
shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified
in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) no later than July 25, 2012. The Discovery Cut-Off is extended to
July 30, 2012 and the Dispositive Motions Deadline is extended to October 1, 2012.
Additionally, the court notes that, notwithstanding the court’s prior order granting the parties’
motion to amend the caption (Doc. No. 26, filed Nov. 14, 2011), in their present Motion,
Defendant is still reflected as “Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws
of the State of Delaware and doing business in the State of Colorado,” rather than “Walmart
Stores, a Delaware Corporation.” The court also notes that, notwithstanding the fact that this
case was reassigned to District Judge R. Brooke Jackson on September 26, 2011 (Doc. No. 20),
the caption in the parties’ motion incorrectly includes the initials “MSK” rather than “RBJ.” All
future filings must include a caption that correctly reflects the proper parties and the initials of
the assigned district judge.
Dated: February 27, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?