Bleck v. City of Alamosa, Colorado et al

Filing 109

ORDER. The Stipulated Motion For Partial Dismissal 108 filed 12/13/2011, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against defendants, John Jackson and B. Cooper, are DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/14/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 10-cv-03177-REB-KMT STEVE W. BLECK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALAMOSA, COLORADO, JOHN JACKSON, individually, and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Alamosa Police Department, JEFF MARTINEZ, individually, and in his official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer of the Alamosa Police Department, and B. COOPER, individually, and in his official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer of the Alamosa Police Department, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS B. COOPER AND JOHN JACKSON, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion For Partial Dismissal [#108]1 filed December 13, 2011. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, John Jackson and B. Cooper, should be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion For Partial Dismissal [#108] filed December 13, 2011, is GRANTED; 2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendants, John Jackson and B. Cooper, are 1 “[#108]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. DISMISSED; and 3. That defendants, John Jackson and B. Cooper, are DROPPED as named parties to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated December 14, 2011, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?