Bleck v. City of Alamosa, Colorado et al

Filing 52

MINUTE ORDER. The Joint Motion to Stay Case Deadlines Pending Court Ruling on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery" 44 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Expert Witness Disclosures 10/21/2011; Rebu ttal Expert Witness Disclosures 11/21/2011; Discovery due by 12/21/2011; Dispositive Motions due by 1/20/2012; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/9/2012 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/28/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 10–cv–03177–REB–KMT STEVE W. BLECK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALAMOSA, COLORADO, JOHN JACKSON, individually, and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Alamosa Police Department, JEFF MARTINEZ, individually, and in his official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer of the Alamosa Police Department, B. COOPER, individually, and in his official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer of the Alamosa Police Department, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA The “Joint Motion to Stay Case Deadlines Pending Court Ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery”(Doc. No. 44, filed September 12, 2011) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with the Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ Motion to Stay. (Doc. No. 51.) The deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order are extended as follows: Expert Witness Disclosures Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures Discovery Cutoff Dispositive Motions Deadline Final Pretrial Conference Dated: September 28, 2011 October 21, 2011 November 21, 2011 December 21, 2011 January 20, 2012 February 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?