Lopez v. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. et al
Filing
133
ORDER granting 130 Motion to Resolve and 90 Motion to Compel subject to terms, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/30/12.(lswsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00081-LTB-BNB
BRENDA M. LOPEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUNCOR ENERGY (U.S.A.) INC., a Delaware corporation, and
SUNCOR ENERGY SERVICES INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Attorney Fees
[Doc. # 90, filed 3/21/2012] (the “Motion to Compel”); and
(2)
Joint Motion to Resolve Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses
and for Attorneys Fees [Doc. # 130, filed 5/24/2012] (the “Motion to Resolve”).
The parties have reached an agreement to resolve the matters in dispute, as specified in
the Motion to Resolve.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion to Resolve [Doc. # 130] is GRANTED;
(2)
The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 90] is GRANTED as confessed, subject to the
following terms:
• The plaintiff shall provide answers and responses to each of the defendants’
pending interrogatories and requests for production, without objections, in accordance with
defendants’ arguments, on or before June 6, 2012;
• The defendants request for an award of attorneys fees and other sanctions in
connection with the Motion to Compel, as directed against the plaintiff personally and her
current counsel, is withdrawn with prejudice; and
• The defendants, at their option, may seek an award of attorneys fees against the
plaintiff’s former counsel in connection with the Motion to Compel. Any such motion shall be
filed, if at all, on or before June 15, 2012.
Dated May 30, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?