King v. Allstate Insurance Company
Filing
198
ORDER denying 168 Defendants Renewed Motion to Strike Untimely Declaration of Plaintiffs Expert Stephen D. Prater ECF No. 168 is DENIED; Discovery is REOPENED until August 8, 2013 for the sole purpose of allowing Defendant to reconvene Mr. Praters deposition for up to four hours and inquire about any opinions contained in the February 28, 2013 Declaration, by Judge William J. Martinez on 7/23/2013.(ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00103-WJM-BNB
DENNIS W. KING, Colorado resident and U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee for bankrupt SHERI
L. LAUK, a Colorado resident,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION TO STRIKE
UNTIMELY DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT
Before the Court is Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Strike Untimely Declaration
of Plaintiff’s Expert Stephen D. Prater (“Motion”). (ECF No. 168.) Defendant contends
that Mr. Prater’s February 28, 2012 Declaration (ECF No. 121-1), which was submitted
in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, should be
stricken because it is a supplemental expert report submitted after the close of expert
discovery. (ECF No. 168 at 5.) In response, Plaintiff argues that Mr. Prater’s
Declaration does not contain any new opinions but was prepared only to serve as a
boiled-down version of Mr. Prater’s opinions for purposes of summary judgment. (ECF
No. 181.)
In the interest of fairness and judicial economy, the Court finds that the most
expedient way to resolve this dispute is to deny the Motion to Strike. However, to
minimize any prejudice to Defendant regarding any new opinions contained in the
Declaration, the Court will reopen discovery for the sole purpose of allowing Defendant
to reconvene Mr. Prater’s deposition.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1.
Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Strike Untimely Declaration of Plaintiff’s Expert
Stephen D. Prater (ECF No. 168) is DENIED;
2.
Discovery is REOPENED until August 8, 2013 for the sole purpose of allowing
Defendant to reconvene Mr. Prater’s deposition for up to four hours and inquire
about any opinions contained in the February 28, 2013 Declaration.
Dated this 23rd day of July, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?