Wolfe v. AspenBio Pharma Inc. et al.

Filing 52

JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 51 Order by Clerk on 9/14/12. (mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00165-REB-KMT JOHN WOLFE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MIKE MARNHOUT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and SHAZI IQBAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASPENBIO PHARMA, INC., a Colorado corporation, RICHARD G. DONNELLY, GREGORY PUSEY, JEFFREY G. McGONEGAL, MARK COLGIN, and ROBERT CASPARI, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order Granting Motion To Dismiss [#51] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on September 13, 2012, which order is incorporated herein by this reference. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendants’ Combined Motions and Brief To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Class Action Complaint [#39], filed October 7, 2011, is GRANTED; 2. That plaintiffs’ claims against defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state claims on which relief may be granted; and 3. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendants, AspenBio Pharma, Inc., a Colorado corporation; Richard G. Donnelly; Gregory Pusey; Jeffrey G. McGonegal; Mark Colgin; and Robert Caspari, against plaintiffs, John Wolfe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Mike Marnhout, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and Shazi Iqbal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as to all claims and causes of action asserted herein; provided, however, that the JUDGMENT IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 14th day of September, 2012. FOR THE COURT: Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?