Tillman v. Murphy et al.
Filing
83
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 80 Notice of Appeal by Louis E. Tillman, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/6/12. (lswsl )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00196-WYD-CBS
LOUIS E. TILLMAN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TIMOTHY R. MURPHY, and
MHC KENWORTH,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL
Daniel, Chief Judge
Plaintiff has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Plaintiff previously was allowed to proceed in
forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined
the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied.
Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this
appeal is not taken in good faith because plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned,
nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly,
it is
ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this
appeal is not taken in good faith.
Dated: November 6, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?