Sun River Energy, Inc. v. Nelson et al

Filing 194

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 191 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Third Set of Written Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/10/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH
SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIK S. NELSON,
STEVE STEPHENS, and
CORAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 10, 2012.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Third Set of Written Discovery [filed
April 6, 2012; docket #191] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P.
37(a)(1) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D.
Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not
satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).