Sun River Energy, Inc. v. Nelson et al

Filing 88

MINUTE ORDER granting 83 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Amended Counterclaims, and for Plaintiff to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims; and denying as moot 82 Plain tiff's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Document Requests in Defendants' Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Redgie Green and Steve Weathers. Plaintiff shall file a responsive pleading to Defendants' Amended Counterclaims and file a Reply brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims on or before 6/17/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/1/2011. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH
SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIK S. NELSON,
STEVE STEPHENS, and
CORAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 1, 2011.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants’ Amended
Counterclaims, and for Plaintiff to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims [filed
May 31, 2011; docket #83] is granted. Plaintiff shall file a responsive pleading to Defendants’
Amended Counterclaims and file a Reply brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
on or before June 17, 2011.
In light of the settlement of this matter, Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding
Document Requests in Defendants’ Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Redgie Green and Steve Weathers
[filed May 27, 2011; docket #82] is denied as moot.