Wilderness Society, The et al v. United States Forest Service et al

Filing 102

ORDER Granting 101 the parties Joint Motion to Dismiss. It is further ORDERED that the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Order. Notwithstanding the dismissal of this action, the Court retains jurisdiction solely to enforce the terms of the attached Settlement Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994), by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/16/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00246-WYD THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, QUIET USE COALITION, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, and GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and JERRI MARR, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Defendants, and COLORADO OFF HIGHWAY VEHICLE COALITION, TRAILS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, and THE BLUERIBBON COALITION, Intervenor Defendants. ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs and Defendants have reached a settlement of this case and move the Court to approve the settlement and dismiss the case with prejudice. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 101), filed November 13, 2015, is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Order. Notwithstanding the dismissal of this action, the Court retains jurisdiction solely to enforce the terms of the attached Settlement Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).   Dated: November 16, 2015 BY THE COURT:                               /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel                    WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?