Milligan v. Archuleta et al
Filing
12
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 9 Notice of Appeal by Michael Milligan, appellant hsa 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/17/11. (bjrsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00250-LTB
MICHAEL MILLIGAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOU ARCHULETA,
CHARLES SANCHEZ,
LANCE MIKLICH, and
KEVIN FURTON,
Defendants.
ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY
Babcock, Senior Judge
Plaintiff submitted a Notice of Appeal on May 13, 2011. The court has determined that the
document is deficient as described in this order. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the following if
he wishes to pursue this appeal.
(A)
Filing Fee
is not submitted
X
(B)
Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
and Fed. R. App. P. 24:
X
is not submitted
is missing affidavit
is missing certified copy of prisoner’s trust fund statement for the 6-month period
immediately preceding this filing
is missing required financial information
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form)
other
Accordingly, it is
1
ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within 30 days from the
date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff filed in response to this order must include the civil
action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Plaintiff, together with a copy
of this order, an original and one copy of the following forms: Motion and Affidavit for Leave
to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within 30
days from the date of this order, the court of appeals will be so notified.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 17th day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?