Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. BI Incorporated

Filing 127

ORDER granting 125 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order Regarding Post-Markman Deadlines, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/12/13.(cbssec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00301-DME-CBS ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff, v. BI INCORPORATED, a Colorado Corporation, and GEO CARE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendants. ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING POST-MARKMAN DEADLINES This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling 125 Order regarding post-Markman deadlines [Dkt. #_____] (the "Motion"). The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion and having been fully advised in the premises, finds good cause and grants the Motion. Therefore, it is: ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court's Scheduling Order [Dkt. # 28] is amended as follows: XI. L. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE Post-Markman Deadlines: 1. 15 days after Federal Circuit Opinion Final Infringement, Invalidity and Unenforceability Contentions. EXHIBIT A 2. 15 days after Infringement Contentions The party bearing the burden of proof shall disclose information specified under Rule 26 concerning its expert witnesses. 3. 30 days after Plaintiff’s expert disclosure The party against which an expert is endorsed pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall endorse any responsive information as specified in Rule 26 concerning its rebuttal experts. 4. 30 days after Defendants’ expert disclosure Discovery Cut-off. 5. 30 days after Discovery Cut-off Dispositive Motions Deadline. 12th February DATED this _______________ day of __________________________, 2013. BY THE COURT __________________________________ United States District Court Judge United States Magistrate Judge 2 19888068v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?