St. Paul Sober Living, LLC et al v. Garfield County, Board of County Commissioners

Filing 12

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. The Scheduling Conference set for 4/26/2011 is vacated. Status Conference set for 6/1/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. All proceedings other than the pending motion to dismiss are stayed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/15/2011. (mehcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00303-PAB-MEH ST. PAUL SOBER LIVING, LLC, CHRIS EDRINGTON, DONALD EDRINGTON, ADAM TIPTON, and ALEX COLINS, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 15, 2011. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance [filed March 11, 2011; docket #10] is granted in part and denied in part as follows. The Court must satisfy itself of subject matter jurisdiction at any time during a lawsuit. Defendant has raised serious questions regarding subject matter jurisdiction, thus the Court declines to stay the briefing on the pending motion to dismiss. The parties shall file their respective response and reply within the time provided by the federal and local rules. All proceedings other than the pending motion to dismiss in this matter are hereby stayed. The Scheduling Conference set for April 26, 2011, is vacated. A Status Conference is hereby scheduled for June 1, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?