St. Paul Sober Living, LLC et al v. Garfield County, Board of County Commissioners
Filing
124
ORDER granting 123 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims by Plaintiffs St. Paul Sober Living, LLC, Chris Edrington, and Donald Edrington Against Defendant Spring Valley Sanitation District or which could have been brought by Plaintiffs are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and each party to pay his or its own costs and fees. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/16/12. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00303-RBJ-MEH
ST. PAUL SOBER LIVING, LLC,
CHRIS EDRINGTON,
DONALD EDRINGTON
ADAM TIPTON, and
ALEX COLINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO,
a political subdivision of the State of Colorado,
SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT, a Colorado metropolitan district,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS BY PLAINTIFFS ST. PAUL SOBER LIVING, LLC, CHRIS EDRINGTON,
AND DONALD EDRINGTON AGAINST DEFENDANT SPRING VALLEY
SANITATION DISTRICT
This matter comes before the Court upon the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with
Prejudice of All Claims by Plaintiffs St. Paul Sober Living, LLC, Chris Edrington, and Donald
Edrington Against Defendant Spring Valley Sanitation District (“SVSD”). The Court having
reviewed the Stipulation and being fully advised of the matters contained therein, hereby
ORDERS as follows:
All claims against Defendant Spring Valley Sanitation District asserted by Plaintiffs St.
Paul Sober Living, LLC, Chris Edrington, and Donald Edrington or which could have been
brought by Plaintiffs are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and each party to pay his or
its own costs and fees.
SO ORDERED THIS 16th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________________
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?