St. Paul Sober Living, LLC et al v. Garfield County, Board of County Commissioners
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 9 defendant Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County's Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/30/11.(mnf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00303-PAB-MEH
ST. PAUL SOBER LIVING, LLC,
CHRIS EDRINGTON,
DONALD EDRINGTON,
ADAM TIPTON, and
ALEX COLINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, STATE OF
COLORADO, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, and
SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT, a Colorado metropolitan district,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer
This matter is before the Court on defendant Board of County Commissioners of
Garfield County’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 9]. On June 15, 2011, plaintiff filed a
First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 21] pursuant to the Minute Order [Docket No. 20]
granting plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [Docket No. 18].
Thus, the First Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and
the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 9] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading.
See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) (“a pleading
that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies”) (internal
quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is
ORDERED that defendant Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County’s
Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 9] is DENIED as moot.
DATED June 30, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?