St. Paul Sober Living, LLC et al v. Garfield County, Board of County Commissioners

Filing 53

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 the Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Designation of rebuttal experts due by 3/2/2012. Discovery due by 4/15/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2012. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 7/31/2012 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2011. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00303-RBJ-MEH ST. PAUL SOBER LIVING, LLC, CHRIS EDRINGTON, DONALD EDRINGTON, ADAM TIPTON, and ALEX COLINS, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, and SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT, a Colorado metropolitan district, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 29, 2011. The Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [filed December 28, 2011; docket #51] is granted in part and denied in part. For good cause shown, the Court will amend the Scheduling Order as follows: Deadline for designation of rebuttal experts: Discovery cutoff: Dispositive motions deadline: March 02, 2012 April 15, 2012 June 01, 2012 In addition, the Court notes that no trial date has been set in this case. Consistent with Judge Jackson’s Practice Standards, which provide that a trial date will generally be set at the scheduling conference, the Court directs the parties to contact Judge Jackson’s chambers within 30 days to obtain a trial date consistent with the revised deadlines. In light of the above amendments to the Scheduling Order, the Final Pretrial Conference currently scheduled in this case for June 11, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby vacated and rescheduled to July 31, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A501 on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.L. no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. The proposed pretrial order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., WordPerfect or Word only) and shall be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order on paper to the Clerk’s Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the court’s website at Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.3C prior to the pretrial conference. The parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the court will grant the relief requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a court-ordered conference or to comply with a courtordered deadline which has not be vacated by court order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?